SCCBC Forum
https://www.sccbc.net/forum/YaBB.pl
General >> General >> Rush
https://www.sccbc.net/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1380517144

Message started by ReEntry Racer on Sep 29th, 2013 at 8:59pm

Title: Rush
Post by ReEntry Racer on Sep 29th, 2013 at 8:59pm
I give it an 8 out of 10!

Title: Re: Rush
Post by bunracer on Sep 30th, 2013 at 11:06am
Yeah I thought it was pretty good too. Humorous yet factual. at least from my recollection although I had to google why Niki had lost his helmet in the crash and was only protected by his balaclava in the fire. Seems he had "modified" his helmet prior to the event and the impact had compressed the foam inside the helmet and it came off in the impact. Lesson learned eh ? Or is that just internet inaccuracy ? Mike, Keith ?

Title: Re: Rush
Post by Mike_the_Oldest on Sep 30th, 2013 at 2:40pm
I'm goning to see this tomorrow evening (Tuesday is "seniors night"). I'll tell you what I think after I see it.

Title: Re: Rush
Post by Mike_the_Oldest on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 5:40am
I went to see “RUSH” last evening. My first reaction was that the volume of the sound in the theatre was way too high. Is the younger generation deaf??? It’s difficult at time to remember that this is a drama based on actual occurrences. Therefore some literary license may be involved. Overall I’d rate the movie at about 7 out of 10.

In no particular order, here are a few observations:
•      The music used in the movie drowns out the sound of the engines (Now that’s loud!!). And that horrible 70’s disco music really mucks up things a lot.
•      The actor who plays Niki Lauda does so with a good deal of accuracy. There’s one scene (at the Japanese GP grid) where you can only see his eyes and the resemblance is uncanny.
•      The background on how Lauda financed his F1 career is close to being true, I’d say. Possibly embellished a bit, but close.
•      The bit about how Lord Hesketh ran out of money and Hunt signs with McLaren is somewhat vague and may not be completely accurate.
•      People like Lauda had a good grip on the technology available at the time (car set up, lightening the car, etc), but the BRM folks are depicted as being somewhat retarded which I’m sure they were not.
•      Hunt is depicted as going barefoot quite frequently. He had abnormally large feet which may account for some of that and even had the toe of his driving shoe cut off.
•      The guy who plays Hunt resembled him quite a bit. I’m unable to comment on his (and Lord Hesketh et al) lifestyle though contemporary reports somewhat confirm it. Hunt definitely had a temper (he punched out a corner worker at Mosport, I believe) and a “volatile” personality according to reports at the time.
•      At the time (maybe it still is) F1 was glamorous and the danger probably attracted a lot of women. The mortality rate for drivers was very high. I can’t comment on the psychology of all that. The portrayal of Hunt’s sexual activities may be a bit overplayed.
•      Technically F1 was just discovering ground effects aerodynamics

Title: Re: Rush
Post by Mike_the_Oldest on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 5:41am
I couldn't get this part onto the above:

•      Technically F1 was just discovering ground effects aerodynamics and Lotus was the first to grasp how it worked (which was part of the reason why Mario Andretti won his championship) and were half a year ahead of the rest at least.
•      Overall the movie focuses on the interplay between Lauda and Hunt very well. I thought that part was done well.

If you go to see this you can make up your own mind if I’m full of whatever. These are just my thoughts.

Title: Re: Rush
Post by Keith Robinson on Oct 5th, 2013 at 10:07am
Watched Rush last night; 1976 F1 season was a case of real life being more incredible than fiction!
Seeing the movie without knowing it was a true story one would laugh at the possibility of Lauda's recovery.
I was at the 1973 Canadian GP, which was the first time a pace car was used and it got in front of the wrong car and confused the finishing order of the race. While the officials were sorting out who had won the race there was a rumour around the paddock that the teams voted for the Hesketh team to be declared the winners, as they threw the best parties!
The Hesketh team was something quite extrordinary in the history of F1, that day at Mosport I got Lord Hesketh's autograph (the only one I've ever asked for in my life) and he told me that he was 'quite sure Bubbles would have the car running well for the race'!
I still have a Hesketh bear decal on one of my tool boxes!
A great story about a special time and certainly the best F1 movie made to date. :)
Whoever did the casting for this movie should win an Oscar, remarkable!

One more note; Hesketh's family fortune was never at risk, F1 just got too expensive for him.

Title: Re: Rush
Post by wyztek on Oct 8th, 2013 at 5:21pm
Not to take anything away from 'Rush', but I still enjoy Frankenheimer's 'Grand Prix' more. I like the escapism and immersive experience of the in-car camera shots. Some of the film sequences are lyrical and the opening sequence of the cars firing up for Monaco still give me goosebumps. I will admit the characters are a bit wooden and one dimensional, but actually seem a little more believable than the real life characters of Lauda and Hunt. Another case of reality being stranger than fiction.

Title: Re: Rush
Post by Impactblue on Oct 11th, 2013 at 8:23pm
For me I enjoy the movie very much, so much so i watch a documentary of the 76 battle between the two legends. So far it is one of the best racing movie i ever saw. 

Title: Re: Rush
Post by Tire Clinic on Oct 12th, 2013 at 8:35am
Thoroughly enjoyed the film. Well worth the wait!

Title: Re: Rush
Post by Keith Robinson on Oct 17th, 2013 at 1:06pm
Lots of great stuff on YouTube about Lauda, Hunt and the 1976 season. YouTube shows how they were actually quite good friends (Susan, watching the movie without knowing any of the background, said the movie didn't make that clear).

SCCBC Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.