Jeff
Senior Racer
Offline
go speed racer!!
Posts: 122
|
My apologies if I offended anyone, just trying to have a constructive discussion. In my opinion, racing around dubious hazards does not make anyone more of a race car driver than anyone who wishes to better the situation. Frequency racing at Mission has little or nothing to do with the discussion, on the contrary, I would think it an asset in that a more rounded perspective can be offered. I know, we make it out to every ICSCC event in Mission, and have for the past 10 or so years, but we also make it to all of the other tracks in the region, racing at least 9-10 events per year (not including the Portland and 25 hour endure at Thunderhill). My opinion, as any other from racers, corner workers, etc. that may not make it out of the area, all are of value and, again in my opinion, should be viewed with respect.
I may be misinformed, but isn't the reason for the 7a-7b complex because the sanctioning body (FIA?) was concerned with the existing berm outside of turn 8, and would not allow the track configuration as originally designed? So, is the argument that because no one was allowed to hit the berm, the sanctioning body was wrong in it's decision? Do we have to wait until something, that we can logically see potential in, to happen before action is taken the rectify the situation? Does a driver have to attend every race at Mission and be an SCCBC member to voice a concern and offer constructive discussion points?
IF the corner workers find the issue immposible to deal with from a sanctioning point of view, than I like the one tire high idea, or maybe some removable plastic curbing perpendicular to the track. JUST MY OPINION.
Jeff
|